Brilliant Bry *：歡樂吧！生命

(Photo Source: Towleroad, "Protect Marriage, Prohibit Divorce")

終於，我看見有人提出這個想法了！

自從加州公投通過Prop. 8之後，大家當然都很解。住在加州，有投票權的人大概感覺很無力。住在加州外面睜大眼看著投票結果的人，大概真的瞠目結舌：「加州你們在搞什麼鬼呀！？」怎麼又把婚姻界定成一男一女之間的事情哩？

「Only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California.」好強大的殺傷力呀！是不是大家又感覺整個世界有種要開倒車的趨勢？

我那時候知道消息之後，我跟Dustin（因為他受傷最嚴重，從此以後不能結婚，除非他搬離聖地牙哥，搬出加州…）說，「好吧，既然他們要那樣保護所謂婚姻的神聖性，那我們就支持他們保護到底吧！」Dustin問，「啊？」我繼續說，「是呀，那就乾脆立法結了婚之後就不准離婚呀！」

是的，我真的相信，按照他們的道理，那下一步就是要「立法禁止離婚」。不然口口聲聲要保護婚姻神聖性的人結了婚之後，又因為某些因素離了婚，那麼婚姻的「神聖性」何在？神聖的東西可以說要就要，說丟就丟喔？那還有和神聖性可言哩？

有本事結婚，就要有本事不離婚呀！結了婚又離婚是算什麼？管你是因為興趣不合還是性器不合，管你是後來鰥寡還是什麼不可抗力因素？反正結了婚就不准離婚。

我們就讓這些要維護婚姻神聖性的人求仁得仁吧！

而且，這樣我們可以讓大家好好看看神聖的婚姻到底是怎樣的一個態勢。看看婚姻的神聖性到底是在於性別還是感情好了。就不要等下婚後出現一票子狗屁倒灶的鬼勾當的時候開始來乞求要離婚。如果婚姻的神聖性不是建立在於感情之上，而是在於「一男一女」之間，那麼也就表示除非今天雙方不是一男一女了，這樣因為神聖性不復存在，所以可以脫離婚姻關係之外，只要雙方還是一男一女，那麼就沒啥好說法院應該要批准這種置神聖婚姻於不顧的請求。

也就是說，以後異性戀要離婚請一方先去變性。

而且最好連分居這種事情都禁一禁，結了婚又不履行同居義務，那幹嘛要結婚？一樣有違背神聖婚姻的期待，所以要禁止。

以下這個英文的Petition可以參考一下，我覺得真是合意。

A Petition for a California State Proposition that Prohibits Divorce Between Heterosexual Married Couples

Divorce destroys the sanctity of marriage and its powerful influence on the betterment of society.  This proposition would keep the very meaning of marriage from being transformed into nothing more than a contractual relationship between two adults.  Prohibiting divorce between heterosexual married couples will keep the interests of children and families intact.  We will continue to celebrate marriage as the union of husband and wife, not as a relationship between “Party A” and “Party B.”  The marriage of a man and a woman has been at the heart of society since the beginning of time and it promotes the ideal opportunity for children to be raised by a mother and a father in a family held together by the legal, communal, and spiritual bonds of marriage.  As a society we should put the best interests of children first, and those interests lie in traditional marriage.  Permitting divorce destroys marriage as we know it and causes a profound harm to society.  We should be restoring marriage, not undermining it.

And for those of you who voted yes on Prop 8 but disagree with this petition...Why?  This petition is copied and pasted from literature from your website, ProtectMarriage.com, but applied to Divorce instead of Gay Marriage.  So how can you argue with your own words?

We did it, California.  We protected marriage and we protected children by voting yes on Prop 8.  But we can't stop there.  We must continue to protect marriage and to protect children.  That is why we are asking you to sign our petition to prohibit divorce between heterosexual married couples.

Thank you for considering our petition.

上網還可以順便簽名支持一下呢！不想要公佈姓名的也可以選擇匿名喔！請很解的人就順便去支持一下吧！